While there’s no denying the enormous impact legendary comics creator Frank Miller has had on the industry, he still remains as polarizing a figure as when he first broke onto the scene. Whether it’s his admittedly tone deaf content or a lawsuit by a former employee, Miller is no stranger to courting controversy. Over the weekend, a Frank Miller Wolverine variant cover became the the latest comics related hot topic on Twitter with many debating the artistic merit of the piece and the decline of Miller’s abilities as an artist.

This isn’t the first time a Miller variant cover has come under fire. Back in 2015, the variant Miller drew for Dark Knight III: The Master Race #4 was castigated by many in the Twittersphere that had everyone talking about its minimalist and/or shockingly incompetent art style. The DKIII cover evolved into a larger discussion of Miller’s obvious artistic decline with Ng Suat Tong going so far as to call Miller the Donald Trump of comics.

The cover was not without its defenders. CBR’s Brian Cronin pointed out that the uproar was an extension of many comics fans’ inflexible preference for hyper-realistic art, even though other styles are valid:

[The 1980s Wolverine cover] is a great piece of comic book art, but it’s a great piece of comic book art because it is well-designed, not because of any inherent superiority in detailed realism as a comic book art style. Miller’s current art is clearly about breaking things down to their simplest form, to achieve power from simplicity.

As a result, though, people often misunderstand stylized pieces like this as being like a lack of effort, when that isn’t the case at all. We see this, too, with some of the modern reactions to John Romita Jr. on his current Amazing Spider-Man run. The latest issue has a scene with Peter Parker and Mary Jane Watson talking and Romita Jr’s designs of the characters expression have been criticized on social media as Romita Jr. not putting in enough effort into the faces…

There were even positive tweets that praised the cover as “outsider art”:

This Frank Miller Wolverine piece is just the latest of either recent or upcoming variant covers from the artist. You can see how it compares to others below:

Frank Miller WolverineFrank Miller WolverineThis latest discussion speaks to the ongoing debate over realism versus an abstract and minimalist style. In the ’70s, there was a growing shift towards more realistic art in comics exemplified by the work of Neal Adams who famously told Miller that he should forget about a career in comics and go back to Vermont and pump gas.

Reiterating again, Miller is one of the most imitated, influential and powerful cartoonists of the modern era. However, we’d be lying if we said his current work has achieved the same level of praise as his earlier work. Don’t think this is the last we’ve heard from Miller. With the establishment of his own Frank Miller Presents independent publishing imprint, Miller is returning to the world of his acclaimed noir series Sin City with a Western tale set in the city’s past, titled Sin City 1858. Likewise, Ronin Book Two is a follow-up to the six-issue miniseries from the ’80s.


  1. All of them are reminiscent of the work of somewhat-talented middle-schooler. Miller did some important and dynamic work in the 80s, but has been something of a hack for the last 10-15 years.

  2. if this is bad the same way that Jack Kirby is bad, Gene Colan is bad, than I’ll take that any day over Greg Land or any other stiff photo-swiper around.
    That being said, this undeniable impact that Miller had on comics in the 80’s is mostly negative, as two generations of writers, not understanding that his work was satire, as was Alan Moore’s, took that at face value and sucked the fun out of comics, to bring them down in the darkest corners of grim and gritty.
    So… mixed bag there.

  3. Really, I think people should more concerned about Miller’s complete degradation of his writing skills over the last 10 years or so.

  4. “fucking rocks”, indeed. i am completely and blissfully out of the loop of whatever is popular and “good” in mainstream comics and while i’m not a Miller expert (i still haven’t read anything he’s done from Sin City onward and am not interested in the majority of it) i am for this, if only because of how much the nerds hate it. besides, isn’t the old example (Wolverine #1 from 1982) inked by Joe Rubinstein? this is hardly the best comparison one can be making, despite the two drawings being of the same character. frankly, Miller’s own artwork has always been pretty “shit” by mainstream superhero reader standards (or even elitist comics aficionados, i’m sure). look at the original Ronin (a personal favorite of mine) and tell me that’s genuinely “better” than these cover drawings.

Comments are closed.