At noon today, Warner Bros. lifted an embargo on early Twitter reactions to next week’s Justice League film. While the embargo on full reviews does not lift until next week, these early reactions have allowed eager fans to get a general sense of critical reaction to the film.
Given the critical reaction to previous entries in the DC Cinematic Universe (this past summer’s Wonder Woman excepted), it’s particularly important to all parties involved that the reaction to Justice League be positive. Given the film’s tumultuous production saga, which saw director Zack Snyder leave the film due to a family tragedy and be replaced with Joss Whedon (though Snyder apparently remains the only credited director), the best way to describe the feeling around Justice League up until this point is “trepidation.”
With that in mind, it seems like DC and Warner Bros. have scored a light win in the minds of many who’ve been able to see the film already. Here are some of their reactions.
Jim Vejvoda, executive editor at IGN Movies (yes, he’s aware he misspelled “palate”):
Here are some of my thoughts on #JusticeLeague pic.twitter.com/HZfiWC7Abt
— Jim Vejvoda (@JimVejvoda) November 10, 2017
Paul Shirey, editor-in-chief at JoBlo:
#JusticeLeague is a fun, bumpy ride that succeeds in character, but fails in narrative. It’s a mixed bag of execution that’s saved by the actors, who rise above the shortcomings to deliver an engaging, funny and hopeful, yet flawed, entry to the DCEU. @joblocom
— Paul Shirey (@arcticninjapaul) November 10, 2017
The flaws rest mainly on the rapid-fire pace, lack of suspense and a villain that fails on every level to be scary, formidable or memorable. Thankfully, the League does not fall in that category. #JusticeLeague @joblocom
— Paul Shirey (@arcticninjapaul) November 10, 2017
There are plenty of Easter Eggs and some genuinely cool sequences and the Whedon banter is a benefit to the character interactions. Whatever you dislike, you’ll still love the League. #JusticeLeague @joblocom
— Paul Shirey (@arcticninjapaul) November 10, 2017
Angie Han of Mashable:
#JusticeLeague is fine. It’s more coherent & less idiosyncratic than Batman v Superman (which I loved, so make of that what you will), and tries very hard to lighten up on the gloom & doom of the DC universe. There are jokes and everything!
— Angie J. Han (@ajhan) November 10, 2017
Mike Rougeau, senior entertainment editor at Gamespot:
#JusticeLeague is good!
(And I can finally talk about it!)
Wonder Woman is wonderful, Aquaman is surprisingly cool, Flash is hilarious, Batman is drunk, the story is coherent, and it’s all surprisingly funny. It’s not perfect, but really enjoyable!
Full review to come! pic.twitter.com/YzgSL4FBOP
— Mike Rougeau (@RogueCheddar) November 10, 2017
Steven Weintraub, editor-in-chief at Collider, has an interestingly vague tweet that can either be read purely as a comment on the tonal shift of Justice League when compared to Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice or as a double entendre that indicates people who haven’t loved previous entries in the Snyderverse, such as myself, may feel differently about this movie:
People that have complained about DC movies being too dark are about to see the light #JusticeLeague pic.twitter.com/eB1JoNJTvi
— Steven Weintraub (@colliderfrosty) November 10, 2017
If you subscribe to Weintraub liking the film, then Dennis Tzeng, director of video operations at Collider, feels less enthused than his colleague:
#JusticeLeague was entertaining for a good portion of the time though thin on storytelling and character development. There’s more fun, humor and heart than BvS but it also feels very rushed with some scenes given zero time to develop.
— Dennis Tzeng (@ThinkHero) November 10, 2017
Haleigh Foutch, editor at Collider, is also middling:
#JusticeLeague is solid entertainment despite some problems. They pulled off a strange alchemy that works better than it should. The story is lacking, but the League is great and it’s a blast to watch them in action together. Wonder Woman is clutch, obvi.
— Haleigh Foutch (@HaleighFoutch) November 10, 2017
Perri Nemiroff, producer and of Collider Video:
Here it goes … #JusticeLeague is super thin and has some very weak CG but it’s got heart and a positive vibe that works. Overall, I had a pretty good time and am looking forward to seeing more of these characters.
— Perri Nemiroff (@PNemiroff) November 10, 2017
Erik Davis, managing editor at Fandango:
#JusticeLeague is better than BvS and #SuicideSquad – it’s lean, mean & packed w/ superhero action. I dug most of its lighter moments & I think it has one of the best action sequences ever in a DCEU movie. And of course Wonder Woman steals the show. pic.twitter.com/rW3UjpBUMk
— ErikDavis (@ErikDavis) November 10, 2017
Rob Keyes of ScreenRant:
The good: #JusticeLeague is my favorite DCEU movie. It will make you love its heroes and want to see them team-up again. pic.twitter.com/mU2khvwUPD
— Rob Keyes (@rob_keyes) November 10, 2017
The bad: #JusticeLeague rushes through a lot and its main story/lore and villain are rather stripped down and forgettable.
— Rob Keyes (@rob_keyes) November 10, 2017
The future: #JusticeLeague feels like a new start to the age of heroes and succeeds as a launch platform in that, even though some of its newer characters very much would have benefited from origin stories beforehand.
— Rob Keyes (@rob_keyes) November 10, 2017
My mom really enjoyed #JusticeLeague, especially The Flash’s humor, Aquaman’s everything, and Wonder Woman being just that. She even noted and liked Bruce Wayne’s development from BvS to this.
— Rob Keyes (@rob_keyes) November 10, 2017
No details on this scene but #JusticeLeague has one of the coolest and funniest moments of action I’ve seen in a LONG time between two characters. You’ll know when you see it.
— Rob Keyes (@rob_keyes) November 10, 2017
Germain Lussier of io9 and Gizmodo:
JUSTICE LEAGUE! It’s okay. Narratively it’s a mess, the stakes don’t work & the villain isn’t great. HOWEVER, the heroes ARE great, it’s funny, & there’s some surprisingly effective character work. I didn’t love it, but there are enough good pieces to excite me for the future. pic.twitter.com/OY4ARJ5vDY
— Germain Lussier (@GermainLussier) November 10, 2017
Peter Sciretta, owner and editor of SlashFilm:
Justice League is better than expected, but not a home run. The interaction between the team is a lot of fun. The film sends the DCEU in a hopeful direction in line with where the brand should be headed. Flash and Aquaman steal the show. Cyborg and villain are the weak links.
— Peter Sciretta (@slashfilm) November 10, 2017
Terri Schwartz, editorial manager at IGN Entertainment:
I am genuinely happy to report #JusticeLeague is a lot of fun. It’s not perfect and has its problems, but does the job of making you care about these characters as a team by its end. It’s also VERY funny, in lots of unexpected ways. pic.twitter.com/1AAjYgv16i
— Terri Schwartz (@Terri_Schwartz) November 10, 2017
Josh Dickey, entertainment editor at Mashable, coming in with the gut punch:
Nothing could save JUSTICE LEAGUE from its loud, ugly, tacky self. Not Wonder Woman, not wide-eyed Ezra Miller, not Joss Whedon’s quippy teardown & rebuild. And Henry Cavill’s mustache is an actual issue; they gave him Uncanny Valley Face. Oof, guys. It’s a rough ride
— Josh L. Dickey (@JLDlite) November 10, 2017
So, accounting for the outliers at both extremes, it seems like the early consensus on Justice League is that it’s a fun, albeit uneven movie. Around the table, critics seem to enjoy the chemistry between the lead actors, their character arcs, and the lighter, more humorous tone the film is taking. On the other hand, critics seem to believe that the actual plot of the movie is forgettable and that its pacing is rushed.
No matter what, it’s important when reading these comments to keep in mind that the current set of critics who have seen Justice League is rather limited. Additionally, the nature of Twitter impressions is too limited and vague to get a full sense of peoples’ perspectives on this film.
We’ll have to wait until next week for that.
Sounds like their plan to rush to their Avengers movie left them with an Age of Ultron instead.
There is zero chance this is anything but a giant turd. If you can stomach it, they’ve dropped 6 clips on YouTube. Expect Batman and Robin levels of cringe. Scrap everyone but Gadot, and start over, or maybe don’t. Just give Gal the credit she deserves for doing the impossible, once again. Few woman are this loveable and unflappable.
But…everyone seems to like the other characters too? So…maybe dont scrap everyone? Just keep trying to get better?
“…lack of suspense and a villain that fails on every level to be scary, formidable or memorable.”
What would he say if he didn’t like it?
Most of these supposed critics sound like they’re reading off of Warner Bros. press releases. I’ll wait for the real thing.
If nothing else, standards are set so freakishly low after Snyder’s last few films and Suicide Squad – also praised for its ‘fun’ characters by the way *ahem* – that just having a film with coherent dialogue scenes will grant this movie an ‘OK’
Let’s wait and see it before we condemn or praise it, folks.
@George
You know who wants you to take the wait and see approach? The studio. Nobody else needs to “wait and see” anything. That is double talk for “pay us, and then you can have an opinion”.
Screw that. How about “no, this looks shit, you should lose all the money and the rights. No, 5 films in, and they all blew, with only WW standing apart ONLY thanks to Jenkins and Gadot, in spite of the studios failures.
Effects: 3/10
Cast: 1/7
Story: -2 Trillion
Look and feel: Painful and awkward.
Stop the madness.
I kinda want to see this for Wonder Woman and the gorgeous Jason Mamoa, but that means sitting through a terrible movie, so probably not going to happen.
Timberly, are you one of those geeks who hailed The Dark Knight as the best movie ever made BEFORE seeing it? Actually, you remind me of the conservative Christians who called for boycotts of The Last Temptation of Christ and Dogma without bothering to see them.
Your post reminds me of something a wise man once said: “Comic book guys have always had terrible opinions.”
I want someone to CGI in Green Lantern for a Youtube cut.
Timberly, you need to chill and get a life. It’s only a movie. People will watch it and either like it or not. The only stakes involved are $15 or so for the ticket and 2+ hours of someone’s time. Save the “Stop the madness” comments for something that actually matters.
“If nothing else, standards are set so freakishly low after Snyder’s last few films”
I would actually argue the opposite. I think the standards for the DC films are unbelievably high. Things that are easily forgiven in a Marvel film are held up as fatal flaws in a DC film. Looking at it objectively, it’s a double standard.
(Although “Suicide Squad” was a sh*t movie by any standard)
Comments are closed.