Comments on: Area woman finds WANTED morally ambiguous

By: gene phillips

gene phillips — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:03:07 +0000

“Limber” applies, but it makes a strange match with “employee.”

By: Tom Spurgeon

Tom Spurgeon — Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:02:01 +0000

limber?

By: Ben

Ben — Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:43:07 +0000

I’m curious about what the writer of that article would have thought of the source material if she thought the movie was morally ambiguous…

By: Ian Boothby

Ian Boothby — Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:17:37 +0000

Without too many spoilers, the main character seemed very smug at the end for a guy who did nothing but screw up for the previous 90min getting a lot of people killed, more often innocent than not.

Don’t think there was a point except it’s okay to be stupid as long as you’re badass at the same time.

By: Jer

Jer — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:26:06 +0000

Fess up – you just linked to that so you could write a gratuitous “Onion-like” headline for a piece that looks like it was laid out by the Onion graphic design team.

That said, I think the author of that piece put more thought into “Wanted” than any of its creators did.

By: Paul O'Brien

Paul O'Brien — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:37:19 +0000

I think mainly WANTED was trying to say “I’d like a movie deal, please.”

By: Michael

Michael — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:03:19 +0000

The same thing every Mark Millar comic is trying to say: “LOOK AT ME AM I NOT AWESOME YOU WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH ME NOW GIRLS I STUCK OUT WITH IN HIGH SCHOOL AM I RIGHT?”