<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Norton smash!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/16/norton-smash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/16/norton-smash/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:33:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tag</title>
		<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/16/norton-smash/#comment-40890</link>
		<dc:creator>Tag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/16/norton-smash/#comment-40890</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s fair to say that the only real reason THE INCREDIBLE HULK was PG-13 was that cigar and Liv Tyler calling a cabbie an asshole.  Seriously, was there something else I&#039;ve forgotten that warranted that rating?

Non sequitur: TIH might not have technically been a sequel, but come on.  The Ang Lee version was, what, five years ago?  INDY 4 comes 18 years after 3 and it counts.  And SUPERMAN RETURNS, despite a completely different cast and crew 16 years after the last one, was considered more or less a sequel.  Nice try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s fair to say that the only real reason THE INCREDIBLE HULK was PG-13 was that cigar and Liv Tyler calling a cabbie an asshole.  Seriously, was there something else I&#8217;ve forgotten that warranted that rating?</p>
<p>Non sequitur: TIH might not have technically been a sequel, but come on.  The Ang Lee version was, what, five years ago?  INDY 4 comes 18 years after 3 and it counts.  And SUPERMAN RETURNS, despite a completely different cast and crew 16 years after the last one, was considered more or less a sequel.  Nice try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/16/norton-smash/#comment-40889</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/16/norton-smash/#comment-40889</guid>
		<description>the lesson here, anger control issues are nothing compared to the horror of smoking! Go ahead, beat someone up, but don&#039;t smoke while you do it!  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the lesson here, anger control issues are nothing compared to the horror of smoking! Go ahead, beat someone up, but don&#8217;t smoke while you do it!  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rich</title>
		<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/16/norton-smash/#comment-40888</link>
		<dc:creator>rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/16/norton-smash/#comment-40888</guid>
		<description>Perhaps I never took up smoking because the least likable characters -- Mr. Jameson, General Ross, The Kingpin -- were its biggest advocates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps I never took up smoking because the least likable characters &#8212; Mr. Jameson, General Ross, The Kingpin &#8212; were its biggest advocates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franklin Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/16/norton-smash/#comment-40887</link>
		<dc:creator>Franklin Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/16/norton-smash/#comment-40887</guid>
		<description>A disclaimer? Somewhere there&#039;s a wimp who needs a kick to the groin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A disclaimer? Somewhere there&#8217;s a wimp who needs a kick to the groin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Van Hise</title>
		<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/16/norton-smash/#comment-40886</link>
		<dc:creator>James Van Hise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/16/norton-smash/#comment-40886</guid>
		<description>If you stick around for the last of the end credits there&#039;s actually a disclaimer about smoking at the end claiming that the film in no way endorses smoking just because a character in the film smokes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you stick around for the last of the end credits there&#8217;s actually a disclaimer about smoking at the end claiming that the film in no way endorses smoking just because a character in the film smokes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/16/norton-smash/#comment-40885</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/16/norton-smash/#comment-40885</guid>
		<description>So apparently by Ms. Fenyk&#039;s logic the moviemakers were also promoting gamma radiation exposure, violence against innocent cars, and the wearing of purple pants.  I&#039;m so tired of the anti-smoking crusade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So apparently by Ms. Fenyk&#8217;s logic the moviemakers were also promoting gamma radiation exposure, violence against innocent cars, and the wearing of purple pants.  I&#8217;m so tired of the anti-smoking crusade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

