<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE CREDIBLE HULK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:33:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BradyDale</title>
		<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40805</link>
		<dc:creator>BradyDale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40805</guid>
		<description>SPOILERS ABOUND! This is for people who&#039;ve seen it!!!

The Avengers were formed to deal with The Hulk, right? He was the first threat. Somehow, he was also at one of the early meetings, too, though, so I&#039;m not sure I&#039;m right about that. Anyway, I didn&#039;t really think Stark was talking to Ross about getting the Hulk to join so much as helping with the team somehow.

Anyway, I really enjoyed this HULK but I&#039;m not too critical.

I liked Ang Lee&#039;s Hulk, too. I definitely liked Bana better (but I sort of just love Eric Bana and think he has this really great pained element to him that makes him a good Hector, Banner or tortured Israeli assassin).

The scene there Blonsky fights the Hulk after his first dose of super soldier serum was money. I wish that would have gone on longer. It was like Spider-Man versus the Hulk. Great stuff. Tons of fun. Loved the big shields the Hulk made out of the weapons.

THIS IS DEFINITELY A BETTER HULK (character)!!! The Hulk needs to talk some, so that was great. Thank GOD we got a &quot;HULK SMASH!!!&quot;. I also liked the fact that we got to see the softer side of the Hulk. The love triangle of Bruce - Hulk - Betty is really awesome. I loved the scene with Betty under the rocks. I also loved it when he saved her from the helicopter and gave Ross the dirt look after. The kiss before Bruce jumps out of the Helicopter was great, too. I thought those were some strong moments. Cliched, yes... but I felt them because I know the love between these characters and it was good stuff.

In fact, as I think about it, I like Connelly better as Betty and Bana better as Bruce, but I might actually like Tyler-Norton better as Bruce-Betty. I think they were more believable together... and that scene where Tyler jumps on top of a transforming Bruce WAS HUGE!!! I don&#039;t know if Connelly would have even been game. Anyway, Tyler did that awesomely and that moment gets a gold star for the director/scripter from me.

I&#039;m just going to say it: Liv Tyler is the first woman we&#039;ve seen in a comic book movie who has the guts and verve of some of the great comic book ladies. I think most of the women that have been cast have that sort of quiet, shy quality. Tyler really was able to show some fire from time to time, and a comic book lady has to have some fire in her belly. Connelly didn&#039;t really. Garner DEFINITELY never whowed it in Elektra or DD.

Fanboy Geek-out: Very angry I didn&#039;t pick up on who Samuel Sterns was. Yo, did anyone else notice that Betty was dating Doc. Samson??? WTF? Lame? A little.

Very happy that this was not really another origin movie. I really liked the way they dealt with that. Gloss over it again real quick and then get into a classic Hulk story. that was very cool. I was really dreading going back through that whole process again. The Hulk is sort of like Superman... people have a rough idea how he works and where it came from. No need to rehash it.

Anyway, I liked it. I&#039;ll get the DVD, you betcha. I liked IRON MAN better, but this was good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SPOILERS ABOUND! This is for people who&#8217;ve seen it!!!</p>
<p>The Avengers were formed to deal with The Hulk, right? He was the first threat. Somehow, he was also at one of the early meetings, too, though, so I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;m right about that. Anyway, I didn&#8217;t really think Stark was talking to Ross about getting the Hulk to join so much as helping with the team somehow.</p>
<p>Anyway, I really enjoyed this HULK but I&#8217;m not too critical.</p>
<p>I liked Ang Lee&#8217;s Hulk, too. I definitely liked Bana better (but I sort of just love Eric Bana and think he has this really great pained element to him that makes him a good Hector, Banner or tortured Israeli assassin).</p>
<p>The scene there Blonsky fights the Hulk after his first dose of super soldier serum was money. I wish that would have gone on longer. It was like Spider-Man versus the Hulk. Great stuff. Tons of fun. Loved the big shields the Hulk made out of the weapons.</p>
<p>THIS IS DEFINITELY A BETTER HULK (character)!!! The Hulk needs to talk some, so that was great. Thank GOD we got a &#8220;HULK SMASH!!!&#8221;. I also liked the fact that we got to see the softer side of the Hulk. The love triangle of Bruce &#8211; Hulk &#8211; Betty is really awesome. I loved the scene with Betty under the rocks. I also loved it when he saved her from the helicopter and gave Ross the dirt look after. The kiss before Bruce jumps out of the Helicopter was great, too. I thought those were some strong moments. Cliched, yes&#8230; but I felt them because I know the love between these characters and it was good stuff.</p>
<p>In fact, as I think about it, I like Connelly better as Betty and Bana better as Bruce, but I might actually like Tyler-Norton better as Bruce-Betty. I think they were more believable together&#8230; and that scene where Tyler jumps on top of a transforming Bruce WAS HUGE!!! I don&#8217;t know if Connelly would have even been game. Anyway, Tyler did that awesomely and that moment gets a gold star for the director/scripter from me.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just going to say it: Liv Tyler is the first woman we&#8217;ve seen in a comic book movie who has the guts and verve of some of the great comic book ladies. I think most of the women that have been cast have that sort of quiet, shy quality. Tyler really was able to show some fire from time to time, and a comic book lady has to have some fire in her belly. Connelly didn&#8217;t really. Garner DEFINITELY never whowed it in Elektra or DD.</p>
<p>Fanboy Geek-out: Very angry I didn&#8217;t pick up on who Samuel Sterns was. Yo, did anyone else notice that Betty was dating Doc. Samson??? WTF? Lame? A little.</p>
<p>Very happy that this was not really another origin movie. I really liked the way they dealt with that. Gloss over it again real quick and then get into a classic Hulk story. that was very cool. I was really dreading going back through that whole process again. The Hulk is sort of like Superman&#8230; people have a rough idea how he works and where it came from. No need to rehash it.</p>
<p>Anyway, I liked it. I&#8217;ll get the DVD, you betcha. I liked IRON MAN better, but this was good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Engblom</title>
		<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40804</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Engblom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40804</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;&quot;Plus, Eric Bana is about 85,000 times hotter than Ed Norton. but that’s just us.&quot;&lt;/b&gt;

I kinda thought that was the whole point with casting for Banner.  Making him a low-key nobody (like Norton) seems much closer to the source material that casting him as a &quot;hottie&quot;.  It&#039;s tougher to buy a wounded puppy act from a guy like Bana than Norton-channeling-Bixby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>&#8220;Plus, Eric Bana is about 85,000 times hotter than Ed Norton. but that’s just us.&#8221;</b></p>
<p>I kinda thought that was the whole point with casting for Banner.  Making him a low-key nobody (like Norton) seems much closer to the source material that casting him as a &#8220;hottie&#8221;.  It&#8217;s tougher to buy a wounded puppy act from a guy like Bana than Norton-channeling-Bixby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gene phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40803</link>
		<dc:creator>gene phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 23:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40803</guid>
		<description>I must&#039;ve seen a different movie from the rest of you.  I didn&#039;t find it &quot;by the book&quot; at all.  Frankly, I think you could accuse Lee&#039;s version as being more routine in its execution, albeit in an arthouse-y way.

The script is also a good deal more solid than IRON MAN, though IRON MAN is certainly funnier.

It may make my list of ten best superhero movies if I ever make one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must&#8217;ve seen a different movie from the rest of you.  I didn&#8217;t find it &#8220;by the book&#8221; at all.  Frankly, I think you could accuse Lee&#8217;s version as being more routine in its execution, albeit in an arthouse-y way.</p>
<p>The script is also a good deal more solid than IRON MAN, though IRON MAN is certainly funnier.</p>
<p>It may make my list of ten best superhero movies if I ever make one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmie Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40802</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmie Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 20:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40802</guid>
		<description>Alan Coil:
&quot;Yep. They should have had a more muscular actor. Lou Ferrigno, who played the bribed-by-pizza security guard, is 55. You can tell he was in perfect shape at one point. Roth obviously never was.&quot;
----------------------------

That was my point.  I couldn&#039;t believe Roth even as a post / past his prime tough military guy.  Especially with his Napoleonic height standing side-by-side to WIlliam Hurt ...I actually felt sorry for the guy.  But don&#039;t get me wrong, the movie worked enough and overall, I liked it.  There&#039;s no point in picking on so many obvious holes in story and character.  Marvel is building thier film library and this will do them well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan Coil:<br />
&#8220;Yep. They should have had a more muscular actor. Lou Ferrigno, who played the bribed-by-pizza security guard, is 55. You can tell he was in perfect shape at one point. Roth obviously never was.&#8221;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>That was my point.  I couldn&#8217;t believe Roth even as a post / past his prime tough military guy.  Especially with his Napoleonic height standing side-by-side to WIlliam Hurt &#8230;I actually felt sorry for the guy.  But don&#8217;t get me wrong, the movie worked enough and overall, I liked it.  There&#8217;s no point in picking on so many obvious holes in story and character.  Marvel is building thier film library and this will do them well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tag</title>
		<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40801</link>
		<dc:creator>Tag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40801</guid>
		<description>I saw it Friday night in a big Union Square theater and the crowd ate it up with a spoon.  The kids loved the shit out of it, and I heard a group squeal &quot;IRON MAN!!!&quot; when RD2 appeared at the end.  Yes, the effects are a bit... squalid, and there isn&#039;t a whole lot of character development, but it did what I think any movie about this character should, and that was SMASHY-SMASHY.  I think Liv Tyler was kind of a non-entity, more of a plot device.  As for Norton, well, he may not be quite so handsome as Bana, but he does look more the part of a nebbish like Banner, with a nearly constant look of subdued panic.

I was waiting for another cameo by Samuel L. Jackson, visiting Tim Roth in lockdown at the end and calling him Ringo.  Cheap, perhaps, but it would have been cute.

The guys I saw it with wanted to bag on the Ang Lee version when it was all done, but I felt compelled to remind them that THE ADJECTIVELESS HULK was a good film, just not a great one for the character.  This one is all about letting The Hulk flaunt his goods.  I was surprised they never had him do his enormous leap, but they may have wished to avoid any comparison to the Lee version.  All told, I felt I got my money&#039;s worth; YMMV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw it Friday night in a big Union Square theater and the crowd ate it up with a spoon.  The kids loved the shit out of it, and I heard a group squeal &#8220;IRON MAN!!!&#8221; when RD2 appeared at the end.  Yes, the effects are a bit&#8230; squalid, and there isn&#8217;t a whole lot of character development, but it did what I think any movie about this character should, and that was SMASHY-SMASHY.  I think Liv Tyler was kind of a non-entity, more of a plot device.  As for Norton, well, he may not be quite so handsome as Bana, but he does look more the part of a nebbish like Banner, with a nearly constant look of subdued panic.</p>
<p>I was waiting for another cameo by Samuel L. Jackson, visiting Tim Roth in lockdown at the end and calling him Ringo.  Cheap, perhaps, but it would have been cute.</p>
<p>The guys I saw it with wanted to bag on the Ang Lee version when it was all done, but I felt compelled to remind them that THE ADJECTIVELESS HULK was a good film, just not a great one for the character.  This one is all about letting The Hulk flaunt his goods.  I was surprised they never had him do his enormous leap, but they may have wished to avoid any comparison to the Lee version.  All told, I felt I got my money&#8217;s worth; YMMV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Rice</title>
		<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40800</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40800</guid>
		<description>I saw it last night, and my reaction is similar to Heidi&#039;s.  Feh.

I liked Ang Lee&#039;s version much better, thought this Hulk looked even more fake than the last, thought Norton was merely adequate, and LeTerrier&#039;s staging, particularly of the dialogue scenes (symmetrical two-shot, anyone?), was pedestrian at best, and boring as fuck at worst.
As Jimmy said, it will make money, but that doesn&#039;t mean much. The Pirates of the Caribbean made money, but quality? Not so much.
On to Dark Knight...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw it last night, and my reaction is similar to Heidi&#8217;s.  Feh.</p>
<p>I liked Ang Lee&#8217;s version much better, thought this Hulk looked even more fake than the last, thought Norton was merely adequate, and LeTerrier&#8217;s staging, particularly of the dialogue scenes (symmetrical two-shot, anyone?), was pedestrian at best, and boring as fuck at worst.<br />
As Jimmy said, it will make money, but that doesn&#8217;t mean much. The Pirates of the Caribbean made money, but quality? Not so much.<br />
On to Dark Knight&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcus lusk</title>
		<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40799</link>
		<dc:creator>marcus lusk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 23:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40799</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t under the impression Stark was referring to the Hulk joining his team, but rather the team helping General Ross tackle the Hulk.

One scene that&#039;s still bugging me is the end of the campus battle, where we&#039;re somehow supposed to know that the Hulk has escaped with Betty. The scene just cuts away with no indication of that happening.  The obvious shot would have been one of Hulk&#039;s trademark leaps, right up and out of those flames.  I&#039;m wondering why such an obvious opportunity was missed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t under the impression Stark was referring to the Hulk joining his team, but rather the team helping General Ross tackle the Hulk.</p>
<p>One scene that&#8217;s still bugging me is the end of the campus battle, where we&#8217;re somehow supposed to know that the Hulk has escaped with Betty. The scene just cuts away with no indication of that happening.  The obvious shot would have been one of Hulk&#8217;s trademark leaps, right up and out of those flames.  I&#8217;m wondering why such an obvious opportunity was missed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmy palmiotti</title>
		<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40798</link>
		<dc:creator>jimmy palmiotti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 22:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40798</guid>
		<description>heidi,  the movie is by the book if you know the comic character inside and out, yes...but saw it today with a healthy audience and they loved it. it will make money and it is serviceable at best. its a summer movie and does the job.


most embarrassing stuff in the movie is the scene with tony stark towards the end. nothing like having him approach the general who is downing shots faster than he can breath,  in a bar... about getting a guy he has no control over to join the avengers...whf? ....and the horrible job done melding tim roths head on another persons body. i was embarrassed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heidi,  the movie is by the book if you know the comic character inside and out, yes&#8230;but saw it today with a healthy audience and they loved it. it will make money and it is serviceable at best. its a summer movie and does the job.</p>
<p>most embarrassing stuff in the movie is the scene with tony stark towards the end. nothing like having him approach the general who is downing shots faster than he can breath,  in a bar&#8230; about getting a guy he has no control over to join the avengers&#8230;whf? &#8230;.and the horrible job done melding tim roths head on another persons body. i was embarrassed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Coil</title>
		<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40797</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Coil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40797</guid>
		<description>This latest version of the Hulk was supposed to be a new starting point for the character in movies. As such, it is a failure. It does not properly explain how the Hulk became the Hulk.

Hulk is a better movie than Iron Man, but most people will like Iron Man better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This latest version of the Hulk was supposed to be a new starting point for the character in movies. As such, it is a failure. It does not properly explain how the Hulk became the Hulk.</p>
<p>Hulk is a better movie than Iron Man, but most people will like Iron Man better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Coil</title>
		<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40796</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Coil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40796</guid>
		<description>The Beat said: &quot;Several people have bagged on Tim Roth’s dreadful physique...&quot;

Yep. They should have had a more muscular actor. Lou Ferrigno, who played the bribed-by-pizza security guard, is 55. You can tell he was in perfect shape at one point. Roth obviously never was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Beat said: &#8220;Several people have bagged on Tim Roth’s dreadful physique&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Yep. They should have had a more muscular actor. Lou Ferrigno, who played the bribed-by-pizza security guard, is 55. You can tell he was in perfect shape at one point. Roth obviously never was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spike</title>
		<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40795</link>
		<dc:creator>spike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40795</guid>
		<description>Re Ang Lee&#039;s Hulk:  the fanboy in me found the comic panel technique that he used somewhat condescending, as if he couldn&#039;t take it seriously as a movie and overcompensated emphasizing the &quot;comic-bookiness&quot; of it all.  It also struck me as Lee focusing on the more superficial elements of comic storytelling, like the Batman TV show and similar movies throughout the 60s and 70s.  It&#039;s pure camp, and reminded me of non-comic fan friends of mine who who would linger on the ads as much as the story when they read a comic, because they didn&#039;t know any better not to.

Also, the story blew.  Ang Lee spent 4/5ths of the movie painfully establishing that due to the unique circumstances of Bruce Banner (subject to prenatal AND later self-experimentation, exposed to gamma bomb radiation, etc), the genesis of the Hulk was like a perfect storm of events, only to undercut it by having Nick Nolte gain illogical powers at the end.  Lee&#039;s fixation on making it all seem believable only made it more implausible by calling attention to itself.  The concept of the Hulk is simple:  it&#039;s Jeckyl/Hyde by way of Frankenstein.  It shouldn&#039;t be easy to screw that up.

So count me in as someone who wants more of a &quot;Hulk smash&quot; movie experience.  But given that this new version seems like a cross between the TV and the Ultimates Hulk, and that the budget doesn&#039;t look big enough for what I expect from Hulk-sized devastation, I&#039;ll wait for Netflix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re Ang Lee&#8217;s Hulk:  the fanboy in me found the comic panel technique that he used somewhat condescending, as if he couldn&#8217;t take it seriously as a movie and overcompensated emphasizing the &#8220;comic-bookiness&#8221; of it all.  It also struck me as Lee focusing on the more superficial elements of comic storytelling, like the Batman TV show and similar movies throughout the 60s and 70s.  It&#8217;s pure camp, and reminded me of non-comic fan friends of mine who who would linger on the ads as much as the story when they read a comic, because they didn&#8217;t know any better not to.</p>
<p>Also, the story blew.  Ang Lee spent 4/5ths of the movie painfully establishing that due to the unique circumstances of Bruce Banner (subject to prenatal AND later self-experimentation, exposed to gamma bomb radiation, etc), the genesis of the Hulk was like a perfect storm of events, only to undercut it by having Nick Nolte gain illogical powers at the end.  Lee&#8217;s fixation on making it all seem believable only made it more implausible by calling attention to itself.  The concept of the Hulk is simple:  it&#8217;s Jeckyl/Hyde by way of Frankenstein.  It shouldn&#8217;t be easy to screw that up.</p>
<p>So count me in as someone who wants more of a &#8220;Hulk smash&#8221; movie experience.  But given that this new version seems like a cross between the TV and the Ultimates Hulk, and that the budget doesn&#8217;t look big enough for what I expect from Hulk-sized devastation, I&#8217;ll wait for Netflix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Beat</title>
		<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40794</link>
		<dc:creator>The Beat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40794</guid>
		<description>Several people have bagged on Tim Roth&#039;s dreadful physique but I thought the point of that scene was to back up what he said about wanting to have the brains of today and the physical condition of yesterday...hence his motivation to turn into a giant green spiney abomination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several people have bagged on Tim Roth&#8217;s dreadful physique but I thought the point of that scene was to back up what he said about wanting to have the brains of today and the physical condition of yesterday&#8230;hence his motivation to turn into a giant green spiney abomination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmie Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40793</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmie Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40793</guid>
		<description>I saw the new Hulk and I agree with Heidi on all fronts, but one bone I thought she[&#039;d pick on for sure was the lack of beef on Tim Roth.  As the so-called heavy / villain he needed to keep his shirt on.  His caved-in chest, scrawny frame and diminutive height made him a joke of a &quot;bad guy&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the new Hulk and I agree with Heidi on all fronts, but one bone I thought she[&#8216;d pick on for sure was the lack of beef on Tim Roth.  As the so-called heavy / villain he needed to keep his shirt on.  His caved-in chest, scrawny frame and diminutive height made him a joke of a &#8220;bad guy&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pulphope</title>
		<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40792</link>
		<dc:creator>pulphope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 13:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40792</guid>
		<description>It seemed to me The Ice Storm sounded interesting before you saw it...the only thing that would make this sound interesting (to me at least) is if they got Jim Henson&#039;s studio to do a really realistic, really frightening Dark Crystal-style Hulk muppet-suit-on-a-guy thing.  I don&#039;t play enough video games for these CGI&#039;ed superhero constructs to pass as real for me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seemed to me The Ice Storm sounded interesting before you saw it&#8230;the only thing that would make this sound interesting (to me at least) is if they got Jim Henson&#8217;s studio to do a really realistic, really frightening Dark Crystal-style Hulk muppet-suit-on-a-guy thing.  I don&#8217;t play enough video games for these CGI&#8217;ed superhero constructs to pass as real for me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarcusLusk</title>
		<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40791</link>
		<dc:creator>MarcusLusk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 23:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsbeat.com/2008/06/13/the-credible-hulk/#comment-40791</guid>
		<description>I LOVE Ang Lee&#039;s films (&quot;The Ice Storm&quot; was a masterpiece) with the singular exception of his abysmally misguided HULK.
But as much as I prefer this new HULK, I do think it would have benefited from just a bit of that poetic  Ang Lee touch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVE Ang Lee&#8217;s films (&#8220;The Ice Storm&#8221; was a masterpiece) with the singular exception of his abysmally misguided HULK.<br />
But as much as I prefer this new HULK, I do think it would have benefited from just a bit of that poetic  Ang Lee touch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

