<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gordon Lee trial begins November 5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.comicsbeat.com/2007/10/31/gordon-lee-trial-begins-november-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2007/10/31/gordon-lee-trial-begins-november-5/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:10:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: matterconsumer</title>
		<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2007/10/31/gordon-lee-trial-begins-november-5/#comment-25783</link>
		<dc:creator>matterconsumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsbeat.com/2007/10/31/gordon-lee-trial-begins-november-5/#comment-25783</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s going to be interesting to see how this one plays out.

Lee asserts that it was an accident and one wonders why  it didn&#039;t end there.  I suppose that he was considered to have been reckless.

But an accident implies that he didn&#039;t intend to give the comic to minors.  The comic is labeled on the back that it is for a mature audience.

And one wonders how this will play out from the law:  &quot;is patently offensive to prevailing standards in the adult community in the State as a whole with respect to what is suitable material for minors&quot;.

Seems to me that if this violates the law that it does so barely.  We will see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s going to be interesting to see how this one plays out.</p>
<p>Lee asserts that it was an accident and one wonders why  it didn&#8217;t end there.  I suppose that he was considered to have been reckless.</p>
<p>But an accident implies that he didn&#8217;t intend to give the comic to minors.  The comic is labeled on the back that it is for a mature audience.</p>
<p>And one wonders how this will play out from the law:  &#8220;is patently offensive to prevailing standards in the adult community in the State as a whole with respect to what is suitable material for minors&#8221;.</p>
<p>Seems to me that if this violates the law that it does so barely.  We will see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

