<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Studio Briefing 1: Rodriguez + Barbarella = good times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.comicsbeat.com/2007/05/22/studio-briefing-1-rodriguez-barbarella-good-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2007/05/22/studio-briefing-1-rodriguez-barbarella-good-times/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:53:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: meltblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Robert Rodriguez to Direct Barbarella</title>
		<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2007/05/22/studio-briefing-1-rodriguez-barbarella-good-times/#comment-17250</link>
		<dc:creator>meltblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Robert Rodriguez to Direct Barbarella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 21:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsbeat.com/2007/05/21/studio-briefing-1-rodriguez-barbarella-good-times/#comment-17250</guid>
		<description>[...] Visit The Beat for more details&gt;&gt; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Visit The Beat for more details&gt;&gt; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Gerhardt</title>
		<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2007/05/22/studio-briefing-1-rodriguez-barbarella-good-times/#comment-17249</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Gerhardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 19:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsbeat.com/2007/05/21/studio-briefing-1-rodriguez-barbarella-good-times/#comment-17249</guid>
		<description>Oh dear. That must be one of the dumbest ideas I have ever heard. To re-make a film that had no plot, was essentially a Playboy bunny clip for the 1960s..oh well...times like these, that seems to be pars for the course. Will she have such hot sex that the reel is going to literally burn up? No, wait, that silly trick he already did...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear. That must be one of the dumbest ideas I have ever heard. To re-make a film that had no plot, was essentially a Playboy bunny clip for the 1960s..oh well&#8230;times like these, that seems to be pars for the course. Will she have such hot sex that the reel is going to literally burn up? No, wait, that silly trick he already did&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guy bristow</title>
		<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2007/05/22/studio-briefing-1-rodriguez-barbarella-good-times/#comment-17248</link>
		<dc:creator>guy bristow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 13:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsbeat.com/2007/05/21/studio-briefing-1-rodriguez-barbarella-good-times/#comment-17248</guid>
		<description>A younger Pam Anderson (with real breasts) would&#039;ve worked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A younger Pam Anderson (with real breasts) would&#8217;ve worked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martha Thomases</title>
		<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2007/05/22/studio-briefing-1-rodriguez-barbarella-good-times/#comment-17247</link>
		<dc:creator>Martha Thomases</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 12:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsbeat.com/2007/05/21/studio-briefing-1-rodriguez-barbarella-good-times/#comment-17247</guid>
		<description>Please, no Rose McGowan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, no Rose McGowan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

