<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media revolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.comicsbeat.com/2007/04/27/media-revolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2007/04/27/media-revolution/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:49:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://www.comicsbeat.com/2007/04/27/media-revolution/#comment-15850</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul O'Brien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 18:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsbeat.com/2007/04/27/media-revolution/#comment-15850</guid>
		<description>This is a very US-centric view of the web, though.  It certainly doesn&#039;t hold true for the UK, where last I checked, the number one news site was the BBC, and the number two was Guardian Unlimited, with various other newspaper sites following behind.  The Guardian seems to be making the transition to the web just fine, thanks, perhaps because they&#039;re actually approaching their website as a website and not merely an electronic reproduction of their print newspaper.  From what I&#039;ve seen of American newspapers&#039; websites, they don&#039;t seem to display the same grasp of the medium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very US-centric view of the web, though.  It certainly doesn&#8217;t hold true for the UK, where last I checked, the number one news site was the BBC, and the number two was Guardian Unlimited, with various other newspaper sites following behind.  The Guardian seems to be making the transition to the web just fine, thanks, perhaps because they&#8217;re actually approaching their website as a website and not merely an electronic reproduction of their print newspaper.  From what I&#8217;ve seen of American newspapers&#8217; websites, they don&#8217;t seem to display the same grasp of the medium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

