http://www.comicsbeat.com/2006/10/16/more-from-marshall-mo/ The News Blog of Comics Culture Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:05:58 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v= hourly 1 http://www.comicsbeat.com/2006/10/16/more-from-marshall-mo/#comment-76427 screen gazebo Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:34:49 +0000 http://www.comicsbeat.com/2006/10/16/more-from-marshall-mo/#comment-76427 A powerful share, I just given this onto a colleague who was doing a little similar evaluation on this. He in reality bought me breakfast because I discovered it for him.. smile. A powerful share, I just given this onto a colleague who was doing a little similar evaluation on this. He in reality bought me breakfast because I discovered it for him.. smile.

]]> http://www.comicsbeat.com/2006/10/16/more-from-marshall-mo/#comment-6750 Pete Bangs Tue, 17 Oct 2006 08:24:25 +0000 http://www.comicsbeat.com/2006/10/16/more-from-marshall-mo/#comment-6750 Glad to see there's a voice of sanity in the town that's prepared to make itself heard. Glad to see there’s a voice of sanity in the town that’s prepared to make itself heard.

]]> http://www.comicsbeat.com/2006/10/16/more-from-marshall-mo/#comment-6749 Tom Crippen Tue, 17 Oct 2006 04:13:50 +0000 http://www.comicsbeat.com/2006/10/16/more-from-marshall-mo/#comment-6749 I skimmed his editorial and didn't see any "even comic books" language, as in "Even comic books deserve First Amendment protection." In other words he treated the two books as he would any other book and without seeming to think his audience had to be jollied along on that point. Which is reassuring as far as public acceptance of the medium goes. (He does make the point that the racy stuff in the Bible seems less threatening because the Bible doesn't necessarily have pictures, but that isn't the same.) I skimmed his editorial and didn’t see any “even comic books” language, as in “Even comic books deserve First Amendment protection.” In other words he treated the two books as he would any other book and without seeming to think his audience had to be jollied along on that point. Which is reassuring as far as public acceptance of the medium goes. (He does make the point that the racy stuff in the Bible seems less threatening because the Bible doesn’t necessarily have pictures, but that isn’t the same.)

]]>