HOUSE OF SUGAR rejected by Diamond

0 Comments POSTED ON Sep 07 2006 AT 1:09 pm BY Beat

200609071306 HOUSE OF SUGAR rejected by Diamond
Rebecca Kraatz’s HOUSE OF SUGAR, which Hope Larson is planning to publish, had been rejected by Diamond. This isn’t a rallying cry, just an observation.

Your Comments

No comments yet

  1. It is interesting to see how books of note such as House of Sugar and Paper Rad find a way to the market (and usually great success as well) even without Diamond’s distribution. I’m betting Diamond will eventually need books like House of Sugar a lot more than independent comics will need Diamond.

  2. Pete Bangs says:

    Thanks for pointing me towards this wonderful strip. I tend to rely on blogs to point me towards webstrips rather than relying on some of the feed sites as so much is relatively worthless.

    This is a beautiful strip and I’ve book marked the site so I can keep track of when the book is published. I’ll hopefully get it through Page 45.

    And Marz is so right, Diamond will need these sorts of books very soon.

  3. The rejection form-letter is interesting. As someone who’ll be submitting to Diamond soon (and for whom their market is a fairly important part of my publishing plans), it offers a few red flags of things to avoid that would make it easier for them to turn down the book (e.g. non-standard format).


Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Journalista » Blog Archive » Sept. 8, 2006: Dullsville - 08. Sep, 2006

    [...] House of Sugar, a sweet little comic by Rebecca Kraatz, has been rejected by Diamond for distribution. By and of itself, this wouldn’t necessarily be news — we all know what Diamond does and doesn’t sell, and it’s why much of the action is taking place outside of most comics shops these days — but publisher Hope Larson has reprinted the rejection letter Diamond issues on such occasions, something I hadn’t seen before. Bonus comedy: “The writing is not up to the comic industry standards,” a statement that’s hilarious on any number of levels, not the least of which being that it’s grammatically incorrect. (Link via Heidi MacDonald.) While we’re on the subject, this thread on The Engine offers a good examination of the issues involved in this incident. [...]

  2. Marketing Monday: No-Brainer Marketing Efforts, Pt. II » loudpoet - 31. Dec, 2007

    [...] Having covered the basics of developing a marketing plan and the no-brainer efforts every publisher and/or creator should be willing and able to implement before soliciting their first (or next) publication, it’s time to delve a little deeper into the specifics of the Simple Marketing Plan. Whether initiated by a publisher (ideally) or a creator (sadly, the norm in comics), every single title needs a marketing plan of its own in order to be profitable. Amazon.com is littered with books no one’s ever heard of because they lacked an effective marketing plan, and there are numerous examples of Diamond rejecting certain titles because of a legitimate or perceived lack of saleability. [...]

Share your view

Post a comment

Donate

Our Sponsors

Contributors

Heidi MacDonald, editor-in-chief

Assistant Editor: Kate Fitzsimons

Contributing Editors
Torsten Adair
Jen Vaughn

Technology Editor: Bruce Lidl
Entertainment Editor: Shannon O'Leary

Columnists:
Todd Alcott
Michel Fiffe
Marc-Oliver Frisch
Rich Johnson
Paul O'Brien
MK Reed

Illustrations:
Maggie Siegel-Berele

You like us! You really like us!

You may also like:

Let’s review!

September 2006
M T W T F S S
« Aug   Oct »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Upcoming Events

    No events to show

The Beat Twitter stream

CLASSIFIEDS

© 2006-2012 Heidi MacDonald - The Beat. Powered by Wordpress. All rights reserved. Logo by Comicraft.